No fish story
Mark Bittman’s article on fish in this week’s International Herald Tribune has some surprising—and seriously depressing—information. For example, it now takes “more work, more energy, more equipment, more money” to catch the 85 million tons of fish a year we eat. Also: despite increasing demands, yields haven’t really increased in the last decade. Fisheries are falling apart.
There’s also the fact that global consumption of fish has doubled since 1973, for both wild and farmed fish, and that 90% of this increase has come about in developing countries. (That surprised me. American per capita fish consumption, on the other hand, hasn’t changed much. It's actually due to a bit of good news—their income has gone up, on average, so they can afford to buy more protein for their diets.)
Wild cod, shark, Chilean sea bass, orange roughy and bluefin tuna are seriously threatened. According to the UN’s report, “the maximum wild-capture fisheries potential from the world’s oceans has probably been reached.” This is partially due to fishing, but mostly due, ironically, to fish farming. According to Bittman, nearly one-third of the world’s wild fish are fed to farmed fish, as well as pigs and cows. This is a shockingly stupid thing to do, given that producing one kilo of farmed salmon requires three kilos of wild fish (the ratios for cod and tuna are 5:1 and a blinding 20:1, respectively). Bittman recommends we acquire a taste for mackerel, anchovies, herring and sardines.
He distinguishes between decent fish farming (“small in scale, focuses on herbivorous fish and is not only sustainable but environmentally sound”) and industrial fish farming (where $1 billion per year is spent on medicine, land gets degraded, water gets polluted, and wild populations are infected with the diseases and breeding characteristics of farmed fish), and states the obvious, too: farmed fish hardly ever taste as good as their wild cousins.
Apparently, though, we can still save ourselves—and the fish in the sea. One strategy is “catch shares,” giving fisherman shares (that they can buy and sell) in a certain fixed-quota fishery, in other words turning them into stakeholders with incentives not to trash the sea (more on this here). It’s worked in the places (Australia, New Zealand, America) where the scheme has been piloted, but it’s far from universal. Still, it seems like the best hope.
That, and eating more sardines.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.plentymag.com/blog-mt1/mt-tb.cgi/5971









Comments
community supported fishery in maine:
http://www.portclydefreshcatch.com/csf.html
http://www.midcoastfishermen.org/
Posted by:anniemade |November 24, 2008 2:21 PM
Or, how about eating less fish? Seriously, does the developed world really need to eat fish at all. It is an incredibly resource intensive industry that is destroying the ecosystems that we depend on for life. If you want to eat fish, go buy yourself a rod and stand by the river. Else, eat plants.
Posted by:vegandude |November 24, 2008 5:19 PM