The States vs. the Fed – who’s making the climate change rules

Fed up with the White House, all but 17 states are moving forward with their own emissions schemes

By Victoria Schlesinger

Courtesy the Pew Center on Global Climate Change (

We all know the US Federal government hasn’t passed legislation or signed treaties to stymie the rise in greenhouse gases, and that environmentalists, business coalitions, and nations have raged about the inaction for years.

Most recently, and perhaps most damningly, Al Gore said during the UN-led climate change talks in December, My own country, the United States, is principally responsible for obstructing progress here in Bali.

To protest this foot dragging, states are taking the lead in combating climate change. In fact, they’re about to lap the Feds. With three regional agreements to limit emissions underway—in the Northeast, West, and Midwest—roughly two-thirds of the union is pursuing climate legislation.

Ironically, this is just how it should, and always does, work. Or so say the history books and John Larsen, associate with the World Resources Institute (WRI), an environmental think tank.

“Both in the environmental arena but also in other areas there are countless examples of where states lead on an issue in advance of the Federal government with the Fed’s often playing catch up,” Larsen says.

A report published in August by WRI points to nearly a dozen case studies in which state initiatives eventually led to Federal legislation, including a cap-and-trade system for reducing ozone pollution and certification standards and processes for organic food.  

“That is partly the intention of the Federal system in the first place. From the beginning there was this concept that states are the laboratories. They are free to experiment,” Larsen says.

And experimenting they are. States are quickly getting up to speed on which of their industries emit large amounts of carbon or rely on those that do, and looking to be the leaders in new types of energy and technology. All but 17 states are creating their own emissions-limiting plan, while governors work to agree on regional frameworks. So far all regional groups intend to develop cap-and-trade schemes and have an eye on the long-term option of linking the regional markets.

But most everyone agrees that ultimately we need federal legislation or we’ll end up with a tangle of incompatible rules that burdens businesses. “A Federal policy is needed otherwise it’s very difficult to get every state to act,” says Pat Hogan, a solutions fellow for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, a policy think tank. “And businesses prefer less of a patch work [of regional rules].”

So while robust state activity is good, what it may be best for is pushing the Fed to action.

In the Northeast
States in the Northeast formed an alliance called the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) in mid-July 2003 with the goal of stabilizing emissions from power plants in the region at roughly 2003 levels by 2015 and then cut them 10 percent by 2018.

The ten states have developed a cap-and-trade system that will go into practice in 2009, with carbon permits allotted to each state that will be auctioned off to power companies. The states are still determining how proceeds from the auction will be used. Those participating include Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maryland, with DC, Pennsylvania, the Eastern Canadian Provinces, and New Brunswick observing. Observer states can attend meetings and watch the decision-making process, but are not allow to vote.  

 1  |  2 

See more articles from In Depth

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Post a comment

Design of the times »
« The Eco-Travel Toolkit

Issue 25

Sign up for Plenty's Weekly Newsletter