A bold statement on climate change, finally.


It’s impossible not to admire Al Gore. He’s smart, he’s persistent (who else would’ve continued the quest to make a difference after having the election snatched away?), and most importantly, he’s bold. His latest climate change call to action demands an end to the use of fossil fuels in the next ten years. That’s right, ten years, not forty-two, which is how long the richest eight nations recently gave themselves to cut emissions by half at the last G8 summit. Half of what, exactly, nobody knows as the well-to-do nations were suspiciously short on details.

Gore describes his plan for reducing carbon emissions by investing in clean, renewable energy sources as “the lynchpin of a bold new strategy needed to re-power America.” Naysaying bloggers bit back that Gore’s speech was simply “empty rhetoric with unachievable goals” and cite biofuel’s descent from media eco-darling to scapegoat as proof that pushing through new eco-technology without proper consideration is just plain irresponsible. Never mind that real environmentalists tried to warn of biofuels’ many drawbacks early on.

Though Big Al’s speech was admittedly a little light on details, we think the overly-critical Scrooges are missing the point—Gore has never once advocated using renewable energy technologies at any cost. What he has said is that the first step in solving the climate change crisis involves America picking up its right foot and placing it in front of the left before it’s too late. For decades, nations have looked to the US for leadership, and while they wait, holding their breath and hoping that we’ll begin to tackle climate change, the president cracks jokes and the Environmental Protection Agency shoves off its responsibility to protect the earth to Congressmen that have their hands tied by big business. Meanwhile, Gore offers solutions, like a carbon tax that would allow us to “tax what we burn, not what we earn,” a step that may just lead us down the right path in solving the climate crisis.

Though Gore’s constant speeches about global warming can seem a bit much at times, we’ll take the nagging calls to action over the lame-duck response any day.  If only the current president were so bold.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.plentymag.com/blog-mt1/mt-tb.cgi/5136


Comments

Oh Al, why couldn't you have won the election?

Oh right. You did.

Al Gore has lost the plot. When I see the energy use of his home, and the way he travels - eg having a car waiting for him with the engine and air conditioning running so he doesn't get into a hot car, he isn't serious. I just wish I could find some science to back up what he says. Glaciers receeding (they're coming back. Ice disappearing - Antarctic is at record highs. Arctic ice disappearing - the North West passage has opened many times before. There's been no global warming for the past 10 years. Polar bears extinct? Why didn't they die off in the past when the Earth has been hotter? Between his mis-information, the science also doesn't support him. The Earth has stubbornly refused to follow the global warming predictions. How much longer can he continue with this nonesense?

Oh yes, if the cheerleader for NAFTA, loverman of Lieberman and Chairman of a *British* hedge fund would just have fought for and obtained what was rightfully his, everything would be wonderful...

The Chicken-Little adulators and Left in general (of which I include myself) need to look a little bit deeper into Big Al, or at the very least, stop deifying him.

His recent proposals do have merit, though, regardless of their motivation (most likely his profit) or likelihood of implementation. So like many things, it's a mixed bag.

Post a comment

Issue 24



Sign up for Plenty's Weekly Newsletter